Jump to content

Mesh

From Surgopaedia

Mesh classification

[edit | edit source]

Desirable characteristics

[edit | edit source]
    • Chemically inert
    • Resistant to mechanical stress while retaining compliance
      • >1.6N tensile strength
    • Sterilizable and resists infection
    • Non-carcinogenic
    • Minimal inflammatory reaction or adhesions to viscera
    • Hypo-allergenic
    • Inexpensive
    • Good incorporation into tissues
      • Mimics tissues it's replacing/reinforcing
      • Medium weight
      • Large pores - facilitating tissue ingrowth and resisting infection
      • Doesn't contract

Considerations for use

[edit | edit source]
    • Position
    • Whether in contact with viscera
    • Risk/presence of infection

Descriptive classifications

[edit | edit source]
    • Weight of the material
      • Lightweight mesh is generally described as <40g/m2 (arbitrary)
        • Can fail/fracture
      • Medium: 40-60g/m2
      • Intermediate: 60-75g/m2
      • Heavy: >75g/m2
        • More rigid
        • Reduced abdominal wall compliance
        • Possible chronic pain
      • Controversial whether this impacts outcomes
        • Recent RCT showed less pain and recurrence two years after TEP with heavyweight mesh
        • RCT showed better outcomes for ventral repairs with lighter meshes
        • Lightweight mesh is generally favoured since it seems to cause slightly fewer mesh-related issues
    • Pore size
      • May relate to ability to clear infections - larger pores are more resistant to infection
      • Large pores allow tissue ingrowth, which is good for extra-peritoneal use but not good for intra-peritoneal
      • Inversely related to weight of mesh
    • Water angle (hydrophobic or hydrophilic)
    • Whether there is an anti-adhesive barrier present
    • Material
      • Synthetic non-absorbable
      • Synthetic absorbable
      • Biologic (derived from biological tissue)

Synthetic non-absorbable

[edit | edit source]
  • Materials
    • Polyester
      • Composed of polyethylene terephthalate
      • Hydrophilic, heavyweight, macroporous mesh
      • Comparable complication rates to other products when placed in pre-peritoneal space
      • Appropriate for extraperitoneal use
      • Infected polyester mesh generally requires at least partial removal - areas that are well-incorporated at time of removal can be left behind
    • Polypropylene
      • Hydrophobic macro-porous mesh
      • Allows the ingrowth of native fibroblasts and incorporation into surrounding fascia
      • Semi-rigid, somewhat flexible, and porous
      • Lightweight polypropylene meshes often have an absorbable component of Vicryl or Monocryl which provides initial handling stability
      • Appropriate for extraperitoneal use
      • Tend to be the best for mesh salvage
    • Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)
      • More expensive
      • Non-adherent to bowel in micro-porous form
      • Can be made in composite-type form - micro-porous on the visceral side and macro-porous on the abdominal wall side to promote tissue ingrowth
      • Impermeable to fluid
      • Not incorporated into native tissue like polypropylene
      • Does not allow skin grafting on top
      • When it is infected, it almost always needs to be removed
    • Composite
      • ePTFE on the visceral surface, polypropylene on the abdominal wall surface
        • Variable rates of contraction, so can cause buckling of the mesh
      • There are also combinations of synthetic meshes with biologic coatings

Synthetic absorbable

[edit | edit source]
  • Materials
    • Polyglactin (Vicryl)
      • Can be placed in any plane typically used for repair, ideally with soft tissue coverage anterior to the mesh
      • Hydrolyses completely in 8-9 weeks - rapidly-absorbable
      • Comes in slowly-resorbable forms too
      • Generally avoid using in contaminated situations

Biologic and biosynthetic

[edit | edit source]
  • Function
    • Largely composed of acellular matrix
    • Provide a matrix for neovascularisation and native collagen deposition
    • Function best as a fascial reinforcement rather than as a bridge or interposition repair
    • Enthusiasm waning for these somewhat - prone to late formation of weaknesses and bulges, and eventual hernia recurrence
  • Classification
    • Source material
    • Post-harvesting processing techniques
    • Sterilisation techniques
    • Materials
      • Human dermis
      • Porcine dermis
      • Bovine fetal dermis
      • Porcine intestine
  • Brands
    • Bio-A
      • 67% PGA and 33% TMC
      • Polyfilament, microporous
      • Expected to absorb in 6-7 months
    • Phasix
      • Knitted monofilament mesh scaffold of P4HB (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate)
      • Biologically-derived, fully resorbable in 12-18 months
      • Essentially a polymerised version of butyrate, which means it takes 12-18 months to hydrolyse
    • Biodesign grafts including rectopexy
      • Porcine intestinal submucosa scaffold
  • Indications
    • Advantage in infected or contaminated fields - but long-term outcomes questionable here
    • Can be used for coverage of viscera as part of a planned hernia with eventual skin graft on top

Specific meshes

[edit | edit source]
  • Monofilament polypropylene flat sheet - 15x10cm
  • Parietene DS  - composite polypropylene and absorbable collagen film. Comes in 12cm or 15cm round, or 15x10/20x15/25x20/30x20cm sizes.
  • ProGrip - composite polyester and absorbable polylactic acid microgrip
  • Parietex - composite patch of polyester and absorbable hydrophilic collagen film - comes in 4.6, 6.6 and 8.6 sizes
  • Symbotex
  • Ventralex ST - polypropylene with hydrogel posterior layer, for intra-peritoneal placement. Comes in 4.3, 6.4 and 8cm sizes.
  • Ventralex - polypropylene/ePTFE, for pre-peritoneal placement.
  • ProLite - polypropylene. ProLite Ultra is low-weight polypropylene.
  • Bard 3D Max - knitted polypropylene pre-formed mesh
  • UltraPro - macroporous partially-absorbable - polypropylene/monocryl - monocryl added to make it 'stiffer' and less flimsy - commonly 6x11cm

Choice of mesh

[edit | edit source]
  • European Hernia Society Guidelines on use of mesh
  • Grade 1 - no risk factors for infection or contamination - use whatever you choose
  • Grade 2 - risk factors for infection but no contamination - whatever you choose, but could consider biologic
  • Grade 3 - potentially contaminated e.g. stoma, violation of GIT - biologic mesh generally recommended
  • Grade 4 - infected - biologic