Lung nodules
Appearance
`A small (<=30mm) well-defined lesion/opacity surrounded by pulmonary parenchyma
- Lesions >30mm are defined as masses, and are much more likely to harbour malignancy, and are generally resected unless obviously benign features
Principles of workup
[edit | edit source]- Differentiate between benign and malignant
- Efficient and cost-effective patient management
- Minimal discomfort and risk of complications
Approach
[edit | edit source]- Evaluate clinical history and risk factors for likely aetiologies
- Estimate risk of cancer
- Manage based on risk
Aetiology
[edit | edit source]- Malignant
- Bronchogenic carcinoma
- Adenocarcinoma
- SqCC
- Large cell carcinoma
- Small cell carcinoma
- Pulmonary carcinoid
- Extranodal lymphoma
- Miscellaneous
- Plasmacytoma
- Schwannoma
- Metastatic
- Breast
- Head and neck
- Melanoma
- Colon
- Kidney
- Sarcoma
- Germ cell tumour
- Others
- Bronchogenic carcinoma
- Benign
- Infectious granuloma
- Histoplasmosis
- Coccidioidomycosis
- TB
- Atypical mycobacteria
- Cryptococcosis
- Blastomycosis
- Other infections
- Bacterial abscess
- Dirofilaria immitis
- Echinococcus cyst
- Ascariasis
- Pneumocystis jirovecii
- Aspergillus
- Septic emboli
- Benign neoplasms
- Hamartoma
- Lipoma
- Fibroma
- Neurofibroma
- Leiomyoma
- Angioma
- Vascular
- AVM
- Pulmonary varix
- Haematoma
- Pulmonary infarct
- Developmental
- Bronchogenic cyst
- Inflammatory
- Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener's)
- Rheumatoid nodule
- Sarcoidosis
- Other
- Amyloidoma
- Rounded atelectasis
- Intrapulmonary lymph node
- Pseudotumour (loculated fluid)
- Mucoid impaction
- Nipple shadow
- Skinfold
- Rib fracture
- Infected bulla
- Infectious granuloma
Clinical history
[edit | edit source]- Vast majority asymptomatic, however look for risk factors and aetiologies
- Risk factors for cancer
- Older age
- Male
- Smoking history
- History of prior malignancy - malignant rate of 64% in new lung nodules, and still 40% if <5mm - hence met until proven otherwise
- Haemoptysis
- Symptoms
- Respiratory symptoms - can occur with centrally located lesions
- Systemic features - B symptoms
Imaging
[edit | edit source]- Risk factors for cancer
- Nodule diameter
- Spiculation/irregular/lobulated
- Upper lobe location
- Growth rate
- Calcification pattern
- Benign = diffuse, central, laminated
- Popcorn pattern = hamartoma
- Indeterminate = punctate, eccentric, or amorphous
- Contrast enhancement (>20HU is likely malignant, <15HU is likely benign)
- Metabolic activity on PET
- Air bronchograms and pseudocavitation - often malignant
- Other factors
- Fat-containing nodules are virtually always benign (hamartomas) - malignancies could theoretically be lipomas or RCC mets but very rare
- Benign features - well-defined, smooth, round
- Pulmonary lymph nodes - small, solid, polygonal, perifissural, oval, pleural/septal/vessel attachment
- Halo and reverse halo signs are non-specific and can be seen in both benign and malignant lesions
- Classification
- Solid
- Subsolid
- Subtypes
- Pure ground-glass nodules
- Part-solid/mixed nodules
- Many subsolid nodules are inflammatory
- Persistent ground-glass lesions carry a high risk of neoplasm
- Mixed nodules are highest risk, with a higher solid component meaning higher risk of invasive cancer
- Subtypes
- CT without contrast, thin slice
- 8-51% of CT shows a lung nodule
- Features
- Size
- Attenuation
- Growth or stable size
- Growing nodules (>2mm) should be examined pathologically
- Calcification and fat
- PET
- Best way to evaluate metabolism of indeterminate nodules
- Solid nodules measuring >8mm that are not FDG avid are likely to be benign
- SUV >2.5 is typically used to detect lesions with a high probability of malignancy
- Not as good for subsolid nodules - be aware that slow-growing tumours (adenocarcinomas, carcinoids, low-grade lymphomas, metastases from renal cell carcinoma and mucinous neoplasms) can show little glucose uptake
- Inflammatory lesions are difficult to differentiate from malignant processes on PET
Initial workup
[edit | edit source]- Assess risk of malignancy as low (<5%), intermediate (5-65%), or high (>65%)
- This is most necessary for nodules 8-30mm in size, since management is generally identical for all nodules at either end of that range
- High-risk features:
- Smoking history (OR 7.9)
- Older age
- Female sex
- Family history lung cancer
- Emphysema
- Larger nodule size
- Location of nodule in upper lobe
- Part-solid nodule type
- Lower nodule count
- Spiculation
- Prior malignancy (met unless proven otherwise)
- Asbestos exposure
- Assess with imaging
Factors that influence the management of nodules 8 to 30 mm in size
| Factor | Level | CT scan surveillance | PET imaging | Nonsurgical biopsy | VATS wedge resection |
| Clinical probability of lung cancer | Very low (<5%) | ++++ | – | – | – |
| Low-moderate | + | +++ | ++ | + | |
| High (<65%) | – | (± staging) | ++ | ++++ | |
| Surgical risk | Low | ++ | ++ | ++ | +++ |
| High | ++ | +++ | ++ | – | |
| Biopsy risk | Low | – | ++ | +++ | +++ |
| High | ++ | +++ | – | + | |
| High suspicion of active infection or inflammation | – | – | ++++ | ++ | |
| Values and preferences | Desires certainty | – | + | +++ | ++++ |
| Risk averse to procedure-related complications | ++++ | +++ | ++ | – | |
| Poor adherence with follow-up | – | – | +++ | ++++ |
Specific guidance
[edit | edit source]- Size-based
- Nodules >3cm should be treated as bronchogenic carcinoma until proven otherwise
- Nodules <=8mm without documented growth are often followed with serial CT
- Nodules <=5mm have a malignancy rate of 1%, whereas those >2cm have a rate of up to 82%
- Growth-based
- Volume doubling in <20 days is considered indicative of infectious or inflammatory processes
- Volume doubling between 20 and 400 days is suspicious for malignancy
- Stability over >400 days implies benign process (granuloma or hamartoma), and nodules stable over 2 years are considered clinically benign (beware that some adenocarcinomas can be very slow-growing - be more careful with subsolid lesions)
- Malignant nodules can decrease in size due to necrosis/fibrosis, however all malignant lesions will grow over a long enough time period
- Indeterminate lung nodules >1cm should be assessed with FDG-PET/CT
- Likelihood of malignancy increases as SUV-max increases
- Small lesions <1cm are challenging to pick up on PET
- Solid lesions stable for 2 years and subsolid lesions stable for 5 years are likely to be benign, and can be signed off on
- Recent pneumonia - repeat the scan in 4-6 weeks, provided no other concerning features
- Lots of systemic features but small nodule - suspect metastases or lymphoma
- Multiple nodules - consider metastatic disease, reaction to chemotherapy, secondary infection in immunosuppressed patients, other inflammatory process - if no concerning features, may be appropriate for repeat scan in 3-6 months
Management based on Fleischner guidelines (2017)
[edit | edit source]- Eligibility criteria
- >35yo
- Has never had known or suspected cancer at any site
- Not immunosuppressed
- Define risk status
Options for biopsy:
[edit | edit source]- Diagnostic bronchoscopy
- Good for central lesions >20mm or for lesions with a visible bronchogram reaching into the nodule - yield 80% when these features are present, 34% when not
- Navigational bronchoscopy
- EBUS
- Trans-thoracic needle aspiration
- Risks:
- PTX (overall 20-50%, requiring percutaneous drainage 10%)
- Bleeding
- Infection
- Gas embolism
- Tumour seeding
- FEV1 >1L considered safe for biopsy, but beware of patients with pulmonary fibrosis who may have a lower reserve than predicted by FEV1
- Risks:
- VATS and sub-lobar resection with frozen section
- Indicated in peripheral lesions with high probability of malignant disease
- For small lesions far from pleural surface, pre-operative localisation techniques can be used
- Intra-operative USS can also help
- VATS and lobectomy
- Pneumonectomy
- Should not be performed without a cancer diagnosis