Jump to content

Breast reconstruction

From Surgopaedia

Goals

[edit | edit source]
  • Produce a breast mound that fulfils the patient's wishes and matches the contralateral breast

Risks/contraindications

[edit | edit source]
  • Absolute
    • Serious medical comorbidities
    • Unresectable chest wall disease
    • Uncontrolled metastatic disease
  • Relative
    • Smoking - much higher rate of complications - mostly not offered reconstruction
    • Obesity BMI >25 - increased risks and harder to achieve a breast mound with adequate volume and definition
    • Larger breast size
    • Radiotherapy - worse for non-autologous reconstruction

Timing

[edit | edit source]
  • Patient preference is important
  • No change to long-term survival, local recurrence, or detection of local recurrence
  • Need to plan this carefully in MDM from the start, anticipating the need for radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy

Immediate

[edit | edit source]
    • Fewer operations, no time without breasts
    • Skin-sparing/nipple-sparing techniques are oncologically safe
    • Multiple surgeons involved with longer operative time
    • Limited time for decision-making
    • Doesn't usually compromise adjuvant treatment
    • I think this is the default approach where there aren't contraindications
    • Contraindications
      • Absolute:
        • Inflammatory breast cancer
        • Poorly-controlled comorbidities/smoking
      • Relative:
        • Stage III disease or higher
        • Need for radiation

Delayed

[edit | edit source]
    • Fewer complications
    • More time to decide
    • Better for those requiring radiation or smokers
    • Mastectomy skin flaps can heal, and any issues can be revised at reconstruction
    • Inferior cosmetic outcome, as a larger area of skin is required to be brought into the reconstruction
    • Autologous reconstruction is typically indicated
    • Second major operation required

Delayed-immediate

[edit | edit source]
    • Skin-sparing mastectomy and place tissue expander, then return for autologous reconstruction after radiation
    • If pathology shows no need for post-mastectomy radiotherapy, can proceed to reconstruction rapidly

Techniques

[edit | edit source]

Non-autologous

[edit | edit source]
    • Advantages/disadvantages
      • Shortest operating time, inpatient stay and fastest recovery
      • Hard to achieve symmetry, especially with large ptotic breasts, unless a contralateral augmentation or mastopexy is performed
      • Hard to do with radiotherapy - significantly increases complications
    • Best technique for:
      • Small to moderate sized breasts
      • Minimal ptosis
      • No radiotherapy
      • Previously augmented patient
      • Bilateral mastectomy
    • Tissue expander then change to implant
      • Often placed in submuscular plane
      • Six months after finishing radiotherapy, or 2-3 months later if no radiotherapy
    • Direct-to-implant
      • One-stage may be appropriate in fit patients with minimal risk factors for healing

Autologous reconstruction

[edit | edit source]
    • More natural appearance, feel and durability
    • Can be done immediate or delayed
    • Best technique for:
      • Moderate to large breast size with ptosis
      • Suitable donor sites
      • Radiotherapy has been given or is planned
    • Latissimus myocutaneous flap
      • Based on thoracodorsal vessels, tunnelled through axilla
      • Either muscle-only, or muculocutaneous
      • Technique
        • Dissect on LD anterior border, then find thoracodorsal pedicle
        • Fashion a high axillary tunnel
        • Transfer pedicle to mastectomy wound
      • Advantages - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition (more than TRAM and DIEP), ages with patient
      • Disadvantage - latissimus dorsi weakness, longer surgery, more than one scar
    • TRAM - transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap
      • Pedicled TRAM is just rotated through into chest
      • Free TRAM is detached, reattached to vascular supply in chest
      • Often requires mesh reconstruction of abdo wall
      • Blood supply from deep superior epigastric
      • Advantage - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition, ages with patient
      • Disadvantage - abdominal weakness, disrupts abdominal wall planes, increased risk of abdominal hernia
    • DIEP - deep inferior epigastric perforator flap
      • Skin and fat of abdo wall
      • Blood supply off inferior epigastric vessels without removal/destruction of rectus muscle or fascia
      • Advantage - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition, ages with patient
      • Disadvantages - requires vascular anastomosis, risk of flap necrosis
    • SIEA - superficial inferior epigastric artery flap
      • Higher failure rate than others
    • Transverse upper gracilis flap (TUG)
      • Thigh free flap
      • Only works with small breasts
  • Combination
  • Symmetrising surgery
    • Mastopexy
    • Breast and skin reduction
    • Augmentation mammoplasty

Complications

[edit | edit source]
  • Local recurrence