Breast reconstruction
Appearance
Goals
[edit | edit source]- Produce a breast mound that fulfils the patient's wishes and matches the contralateral breast
Risks/contraindications
[edit | edit source]- Absolute
- Serious medical comorbidities
- Unresectable chest wall disease
- Uncontrolled metastatic disease
- Relative
- Smoking - much higher rate of complications - mostly not offered reconstruction
- Obesity BMI >25 - increased risks and harder to achieve a breast mound with adequate volume and definition
- Larger breast size
- Radiotherapy - worse for non-autologous reconstruction
Timing
[edit | edit source]- Patient preference is important
- No change to long-term survival, local recurrence, or detection of local recurrence
- Need to plan this carefully in MDM from the start, anticipating the need for radiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy
Immediate
[edit | edit source]- Fewer operations, no time without breasts
- Skin-sparing/nipple-sparing techniques are oncologically safe
- Multiple surgeons involved with longer operative time
- Limited time for decision-making
- Doesn't usually compromise adjuvant treatment
- I think this is the default approach where there aren't contraindications
- Contraindications
- Absolute:
- Inflammatory breast cancer
- Poorly-controlled comorbidities/smoking
- Relative:
- Stage III disease or higher
- Need for radiation
- Absolute:
Delayed
[edit | edit source]- Fewer complications
- More time to decide
- Better for those requiring radiation or smokers
- Mastectomy skin flaps can heal, and any issues can be revised at reconstruction
- Inferior cosmetic outcome, as a larger area of skin is required to be brought into the reconstruction
- Autologous reconstruction is typically indicated
- Second major operation required
Delayed-immediate
[edit | edit source]- Skin-sparing mastectomy and place tissue expander, then return for autologous reconstruction after radiation
- If pathology shows no need for post-mastectomy radiotherapy, can proceed to reconstruction rapidly
Techniques
[edit | edit source]Non-autologous
[edit | edit source]- Advantages/disadvantages
- Shortest operating time, inpatient stay and fastest recovery
- Hard to achieve symmetry, especially with large ptotic breasts, unless a contralateral augmentation or mastopexy is performed
- Hard to do with radiotherapy - significantly increases complications
- Best technique for:
- Small to moderate sized breasts
- Minimal ptosis
- No radiotherapy
- Previously augmented patient
- Bilateral mastectomy
- Tissue expander then change to implant
- Often placed in submuscular plane
- Six months after finishing radiotherapy, or 2-3 months later if no radiotherapy
- Direct-to-implant
- One-stage may be appropriate in fit patients with minimal risk factors for healing
- Advantages/disadvantages
Autologous reconstruction
[edit | edit source]- More natural appearance, feel and durability
- Can be done immediate or delayed
- Best technique for:
- Moderate to large breast size with ptosis
- Suitable donor sites
- Radiotherapy has been given or is planned
- Latissimus myocutaneous flap
- Based on thoracodorsal vessels, tunnelled through axilla
- Either muscle-only, or muculocutaneous
- Technique
- Dissect on LD anterior border, then find thoracodorsal pedicle
- Fashion a high axillary tunnel
- Transfer pedicle to mastectomy wound
- Advantages - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition (more than TRAM and DIEP), ages with patient
- Disadvantage - latissimus dorsi weakness, longer surgery, more than one scar
- TRAM - transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap
- Pedicled TRAM is just rotated through into chest
- Free TRAM is detached, reattached to vascular supply in chest
- Often requires mesh reconstruction of abdo wall
- Blood supply from deep superior epigastric
- Advantage - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition, ages with patient
- Disadvantage - abdominal weakness, disrupts abdominal wall planes, increased risk of abdominal hernia
- DIEP - deep inferior epigastric perforator flap
- Skin and fat of abdo wall
- Blood supply off inferior epigastric vessels without removal/destruction of rectus muscle or fascia
- Advantage - natural look, increases/decreases in proportion to body fat composition, ages with patient
- Disadvantages - requires vascular anastomosis, risk of flap necrosis
- SIEA - superficial inferior epigastric artery flap
- Higher failure rate than others
- Transverse upper gracilis flap (TUG)
- Thigh free flap
- Only works with small breasts
- Combination
- Symmetrising surgery
- Mastopexy
- Breast and skin reduction
- Augmentation mammoplasty
Complications
[edit | edit source]- Local recurrence