CRS/HIPEC
Appearance
See separate topic for 'pseudomyxoma peritonei' under 'peritoneal malignancy'
Rationale:
[edit | edit source]- Need both CRS and HIPEC to see a survival benefit
- Goal will be macroscopic resection with CRS then microscopic tumour elimination with HIPEC
- HIPEC penetrates to a depth of 2-5mm
- HIPEC doesn't penetrate into systemic circulation, allowing for higher local concentrations
Indications:
[edit | edit source]- Best results for mets from
- Colorectal
- Appendix
- Ovarian
- Mesothelial peritoneal carcinomatosis
Contraindications
- Invasion of mesoenteric pedicle
- Diffuse small bowel or retroperitoneal involvement
- Unresectable disease
- Extraperitoneal mets, with some exceptions
Process:
[edit | edit source]- Assess tumour burden - CT is good, MRI may be better, unclear
- Staging - can use Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Index (9 quadrants, each one 0-3. If <20, favourable prognosis)
- CRS - can be a long procedure, ERAS principles apply
- Fill abdomen with carrier solution and heat to 41.5-43 degrees (saline, dextrose etc)
- Add CTX - commonly mitomycin or oxaliplatin
- Wait 2 hours
- Drain and lavage
- Can be done lap or open
Complications
[edit | edit source]- Morbidity 12-52%, mortality 1-5.8%
- Complications:
- Anastomotic leak
- Intra-abdominal abscess
- Intra-abdominal bleeding
- Pancreatic/ureteral leak
- Complications more likely with
- Higher PCI score
- Diffuse tumour burden
- Intra-op blood loss
- Multiple anastamoses
- Side effects:
- Platinum agents: Nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, myelosuppression
- MMC: Cardiomyopathy, pulmonary disease, myelosuppression
- Myelosuppression/cardiomyopathy with doxorubicin