Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Surgopaedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Mesh
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== '''Mesh classification''' == === '''Desirable characteristics''' === ** Chemically inert ** Resistant to mechanical stress while retaining compliance *** >1.6N tensile strength ** Sterilizable and resists infection ** Non-carcinogenic ** Minimal inflammatory reaction or adhesions to viscera ** Hypo-allergenic ** Inexpensive ** Good incorporation into tissues *** Mimics tissues it's replacing/reinforcing *** Medium weight *** Large pores - facilitating tissue ingrowth and resisting infection *** Doesn't contract === '''Considerations for use''' === ** Position ** Whether in contact with viscera ** Risk/presence of infection === '''Descriptive classifications''' === ** '''Weight of the material''' *** Lightweight mesh is generally described as <40g/m<sup>2</sup> (arbitrary) **** Can fail/fracture *** Medium: 40-60g/m<sup>2</sup> *** Intermediate: 60-75g/m<sup>2</sup> *** Heavy: >75g/m<sup>2</sup> **** More rigid **** Reduced abdominal wall compliance **** Possible chronic pain *** Controversial whether this impacts outcomes **** Recent RCT showed less pain and recurrence two years after TEP with heavyweight mesh **** RCT showed better outcomes for ventral repairs with lighter meshes **** Lightweight mesh is generally favoured since it seems to cause slightly fewer mesh-related issues ** '''Pore size''' *** May relate to ability to clear infections - larger pores are more resistant to infection *** Large pores allow tissue ingrowth, which is good for extra-peritoneal use but not good for intra-peritoneal *** Inversely related to weight of mesh ** Water angle (hydrophobic or hydrophilic) ** Whether there is an anti-adhesive barrier present ** Material *** Synthetic non-absorbable *** Synthetic absorbable *** Biologic (derived from biological tissue) == '''Synthetic non-absorbable''' == * '''Materials''' ** '''Polyester''' *** Composed of polyethylene terephthalate *** Hydrophilic, heavyweight, macroporous mesh *** Comparable complication rates to other products when placed in pre-peritoneal space *** Appropriate for extraperitoneal use *** Infected polyester mesh generally requires at least partial removal - areas that are well-incorporated at time of removal can be left behind ** '''Polypropylene''' *** Hydrophobic macro-porous mesh *** Allows the ingrowth of native fibroblasts and incorporation into surrounding fascia *** Semi-rigid, somewhat flexible, and porous *** Lightweight polypropylene meshes often have an absorbable component of Vicryl or Monocryl which provides initial handling stability *** Appropriate for extraperitoneal use *** Tend to be the best for mesh salvage ** '''Expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE)''' *** More expensive *** Non-adherent to bowel in micro-porous form *** Can be made in composite-type form - micro-porous on the visceral side and macro-porous on the abdominal wall side to promote tissue ingrowth *** Impermeable to fluid *** Not incorporated into native tissue like polypropylene *** Does not allow skin grafting on top *** When it is infected, it almost always needs to be removed ** '''Composite''' *** ePTFE on the visceral surface, polypropylene on the abdominal wall surface **** Variable rates of contraction, so can cause buckling of the mesh *** There are also combinations of synthetic meshes with biologic coatings == '''Synthetic absorbable''' == * Materials ** Polyglactin (Vicryl) *** Can be placed in any plane typically used for repair, ideally with soft tissue coverage anterior to the mesh *** Hydrolyses completely in 8-9 weeks - rapidly-absorbable *** Comes in slowly-resorbable forms too *** Generally avoid using in contaminated situations == '''Biologic and biosynthetic''' == * '''Function''' ** Largely composed of acellular matrix ** Provide a matrix for neovascularisation and native collagen deposition ** Function best as a fascial reinforcement rather than as a bridge or interposition repair ** Enthusiasm waning for these somewhat - prone to late formation of weaknesses and bulges, and eventual hernia recurrence * '''Classification''' ** Source material ** Post-harvesting processing techniques ** Sterilisation techniques ** Materials *** Human dermis *** Porcine dermis *** Bovine fetal dermis *** Porcine intestine * '''Brands''' ** Bio-A *** 67% PGA and 33% TMC *** Polyfilament, microporous *** Expected to absorb in 6-7 months ** Phasix *** Knitted monofilament mesh scaffold of P4HB (poly-4-hydroxybutyrate) *** Biologically-derived, fully resorbable in 12-18 months *** Essentially a polymerised version of butyrate, which means it takes 12-18 months to hydrolyse ** Biodesign grafts including rectopexy *** Porcine intestinal submucosa scaffold * '''Indications''' ** Advantage in infected or contaminated fields - but long-term outcomes questionable here ** Can be used for coverage of viscera as part of a planned hernia with eventual skin graft on top == '''Specific meshes''' == * Monofilament polypropylene flat sheet - 15x10cm * Parietene DS Β - composite polypropylene and absorbable collagen film. Comes in 12cm or 15cm round, or 15x10/20x15/25x20/30x20cm sizes. * ProGrip - composite polyester and absorbable polylactic acid microgrip * Parietex - composite patch of polyester and absorbable hydrophilic collagen film - comes in 4.6, 6.6 and 8.6 sizes * Symbotex * Ventralex ST - polypropylene with hydrogel posterior layer, for intra-peritoneal placement. Comes in 4.3, 6.4 and 8cm sizes. * Ventralex - polypropylene/ePTFE, for pre-peritoneal placement. * ProLite - polypropylene. ProLite Ultra is low-weight polypropylene. * Bard 3D Max - knitted polypropylene pre-formed mesh * UltraPro - macroporous partially-absorbable - polypropylene/monocryl - monocryl added to make it 'stiffer' and less flimsy - commonly 6x11cm == Choice of mesh == * European Hernia Society Guidelines on use of mesh * Grade 1 - no risk factors for infection or contamination - use whatever you choose * Grade 2 - risk factors for infection but no contamination - whatever you choose, but could consider biologic * Grade 3 - potentially contaminated e.g. stoma, violation of GIT - biologic mesh generally recommended * Grade 4 - infected - biologic [[Category:Operating theatre]]
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Surgopaedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Surgopaedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Mesh
Add topic