Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
Special pages
Surgopaedia
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Editing
Ventral incisional hernia
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== '''Management''' == * Principles ** Optimise underlying causative factors ** Re-create linea alba ** Tension-free repair * Surgical considerations ** Suture vs mesh *** Mesh indicated >2-3cm or when the hernia was clearly a result of technical error at the primary operation ** Mesh type *** Permanent synthetic materials *** Absorbable synthetic materials *** Biologic materials *** ''See separate topic under 'operating theatre''' ** '''Mesh placement''' *** In general, IPOM and retro-rectus have lowest rates of recurrence, infection and seroma *** '''Onlay''' **** Primary closure of the defect and placement of mesh over the anterior fascia **** Advantage - completely outside the abdominal cavity **** Disadvantages - large subcutaneous dissection, increased likelihood of seroma, superficial location of the mesh, and the repair is usually under tension **** Retrospective review - recurrence rate of 28% **** Best to use midweight permanent synthetic mesh - polypropylene or polyester *** '''Interposition''' **** Secure the mesh to the fascial edge without overlap **** Predictably high recurrence rate - mesh often pulls away from the fascial edge *** '''Sublay''' **** Prosthesis is placed beneath the fascia (intra-peritoneal, pre-peritoneal, or in the retro-rectus space) **** Advantage - natural forces of abdomen hold the mesh in place and prevent migration **** '''Intra-peritoneal''' ***** Composite or dual-type mesh placed below peritoneum with at least 4cm overlap ***** Secure with interrupted mattress sutures ***** Can be done laparoscopically - trocars as far laterally as possible, hernia reduced, adhesions lysed, mesh secured with trans-fascial sutures ***** Probably lower long-term recurrence rate if defect is also closed - meta-analysis 2024 **** '''Pre-peritoneal''' **** '''Retro-rectus''' ** '''Plan for tension-free closure''' *** Progressive pneumoperitoneum (over a 3-week period) - particularly suited for small defects and massive sacs *** Planned open abdomen with progressive closure of PTFE mesh as described under that separate topic - very morbid and time-consuming way to do it *** Botox - see above under 'pre-op' *** Tissue expanders *** Fasciotens *** '''Myofascial release/component separation''' **** Allows advancement of rectus muscle by as much as 10cm from each side **** Is component separation required? Which type? ***** Depends on ability to recreate the linea alba through medialisation of the rectus abdominis muscle while maintaining appropriate tension on the repair ***** Cameron's suggests do a posterior separation when possible, because it provides the benefit of myofascial advancement (as in anterior approach) but also allows wide mesh overlap in a sublay position between the abdominal musculature and the peritoneum while eliminating large skin flaps ***** Anterior release carries the disadvantage of often requiring large skin flaps with significant wound morbidity **** Options ***** Posterior rectus sheath incision with retro-muscular mesh placement ****** Recurrence rate 14% in large incisional hernias ***** Posterior component separation ***** Anterior component separation **** See separate topic for technique *** 'Cytoreductive surgery' - omentectomy/colectomy *** Other techniques described in SAGES manual of hernia repair ** '''Open vs laparoscopic''' *** Laparoscopic repair favoured if **** Potentially more than one defect **** High risk of SSI **** High-risk for recurrence **** Small or medium defect *** Open favoured if **** Many adhesions (need to clear for trocar placement and mesh placement) **** Larger defects - hard to close laparoscopically ** Drains *** Probably don't need to routinely drain sublay repairs, even with retrorectus dissection - doesn't seem to affect seromas or infections *** More role for drains in onlay repairs with big subcutaneous dissections ** Recurrent hernias *** Try to use a different plane - generally use pre-peritoneal for primary repair, then retro-rectus for next repair, and can either try again with retro-rectus or IPOM for the subsequent repair Approach to open abdominal wall reconstruction * Midline incision through linea alba and reduction of hernia sacs * Attempt retro-rectus repair - if unable to close posterior sheath, consider component separation vs fasciotens
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to Surgopaedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
Surgopaedia:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Search
Search
Editing
Ventral incisional hernia
(section)
Add topic